Publications
Can Utility Patent Be Asserted in Court When the Corresponding Invention Patent Claiming the Same Subject Matter and Filed on the Same Day Be Rejected as Lacking Inventiveness?
Can Utility Patent Be Asserted in Court When the Corresponding Invention Pate
Junlong Law Firm Won the Honor of “Top Ten Intellectual Property Cases in Chinese Courts in 2020
Source:广东君龙律师事务所|Author:Ice Tang|Publish time: 2021-04-28|48 Views On the 
Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on the Application of Punitive Damages in the Trial of Civil Cases of Infringement of Intellectual Property Rights
Source:广东君龙律师事务所|Author:Ice Tang|Publish time: 2021-03-08|48 Views The Suprem
Cross-class protection or All-class Protection for Well-known Trademark? – Lukfook Jewelries vs. China National Intellectual Property Administration
Source:广东君龙律师事务所|Author:Ice Tang|Publish time: 2021-03-01|31 Views Luk
The first simultaneous trial of administrative case involving confirmation and civil case of infringing the same patent
Source:|Author:Jane|Publish time: 2020-04-29|21 Views The patent syst
Application of Estoppel in Patent Administrative Protection Procedures of PRC
Source:|Author:pmoed5141|Publish time: 2020-03-25|20 Views China implements t
China’s Top 20 Patent Cases in 2017 Case No. 3 Inventorship Dispute in Service Invention
Source:|Author:China IP|Publish time: 2018-08-15|37 Views Appellant (Defen
China’s Top 20 Patent Cases in 2017 Case No. 2 Patent Infringement Disputes on “Public Bicycle Rental System”
Source:|Author:China IP|Publish time: 2018-07-25|18 Views [Synopsis]
China’s Top 20 Patent Cases in 2017 Case No. 1 Patent Infringement of the Invention Patent for “Remote Software Service System”
Source:|Author:China IP|Publish time: 2018-07-23|7 Views Appellant (P
2017 Annunal Report on Cases Heard by Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou Intellectual Property Courts
Source:Original Article|Author:Ice Tang|Publish time: 2017-09-13|9 Views Beij